<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Is A GWOT?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://veteranveritas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=273</link>
	<description>Hang out for combat veterans and families.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fortbuckley</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=273#comment-1029</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fortbuckley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 14:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=273#comment-1029</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;em&gt;ally–vasal state or colony

&lt;/em&gt;Mike, who do you think are America&#039;s &quot;allies,&quot; according to your definition, nowadays? 

Interesting bit of history:  at one point the term &quot;GWOT&quot; fell out of favor within the DOD.  I was an Operations Officer for the Joint Chiefs of Staff&#039;s &quot;Global War On Terror&quot; Intelligence Task Force in the Pentagon.  We remained the &quot;GWOT ITF&quot; throughout much of the SOF and conventional forces ground campaign in Afghanistan in 2001. 

Then, in early 2002, SECDEF Rumsfeld directed that we drop the word &quot;Global&quot; from the name.  Apparently it made it sound like we were out to conquer the world, when in fact we were focused on the CENTCOM AOR (Afghanistan, India/Pakistan and Iraq).

Personally, I thought that was a mistake.  At the time, the DOD was tracking terrorist groups in the Phillippines, Horn of Africa, Indonesia (the Bali bombings didn&#039;t happen until 2003) and Chechnya.  Sure sounded like a &lt;em&gt;Global &lt;/em&gt;War to me.

Also---who wants to work for a &quot;WOT ITF?&quot; 

&lt;em&gt;our veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan are officially GWOT’s. They are veterans of the Global War on Terror.

&lt;/em&gt;I&#039;d like to nominate the following additions to that group of &quot;GWOT veterans&quot; our troops helping combat the Abu Sayyaf terrorist group in the Phillippines; our troops in the Horn of Africa; the US advisors in Georgia (the former USSR state, NOT the US Southern state); the US forces assisting the Colombian government; the many, many Soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and Coasties keeping our borders and Ports of Entry safe and secure; and the others I&#039;ve assuredly missed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>ally–vasal state or colony</p>
<p></em>Mike, who do you think are America&#8217;s &#8220;allies,&#8221; according to your definition, nowadays? </p>
<p>Interesting bit of history:  at one point the term &#8220;GWOT&#8221; fell out of favor within the DOD.  I was an Operations Officer for the Joint Chiefs of Staff&#8217;s &#8220;Global War On Terror&#8221; Intelligence Task Force in the Pentagon.  We remained the &#8220;GWOT ITF&#8221; throughout much of the SOF and conventional forces ground campaign in Afghanistan in 2001. </p>
<p>Then, in early 2002, SECDEF Rumsfeld directed that we drop the word &#8220;Global&#8221; from the name.  Apparently it made it sound like we were out to conquer the world, when in fact we were focused on the CENTCOM AOR (Afghanistan, India/Pakistan and Iraq).</p>
<p>Personally, I thought that was a mistake.  At the time, the DOD was tracking terrorist groups in the Phillippines, Horn of Africa, Indonesia (the Bali bombings didn&#8217;t happen until 2003) and Chechnya.  Sure sounded like a <em>Global </em>War to me.</p>
<p>Also&#8212;who wants to work for a &#8220;WOT ITF?&#8221; </p>
<p><em>our veterans of Iraq and Afghanistan are officially GWOT’s. They are veterans of the Global War on Terror.</p>
<p></em>I&#8217;d like to nominate the following additions to that group of &#8220;GWOT veterans&#8221; our troops helping combat the Abu Sayyaf terrorist group in the Phillippines; our troops in the Horn of Africa; the US advisors in Georgia (the former USSR state, NOT the US Southern state); the US forces assisting the Colombian government; the many, many Soldiers, sailors, airmen, Marines and Coasties keeping our borders and Ports of Entry safe and secure; and the others I&#8217;ve assuredly missed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
