<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lest We Forget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://veteranveritas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=292</link>
	<description>Hang out for combat veterans and families.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: santacruzsam</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=292#comment-1108</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[santacruzsam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jun 2010 10:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=292#comment-1108</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hypocrisy would be for Veterans of  War to violate their oath to defend the commenters at this post.  Which never happens here.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hypocrisy would be for Veterans of  War to violate their oath to defend the commenters at this post.  Which never happens here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike_brewer</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=292#comment-1107</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike_brewer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jun 2010 00:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=292#comment-1107</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This would not exactly be an unfunded mandate. Waivers are not a transfer of cash. The point being that part time employees and their dependents already get the same benefits.

I do indeed follow your logic and concerns about  Antenori- yet that still does not subtract from the merit of this bill that was 4o years in the waiting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would not exactly be an unfunded mandate. Waivers are not a transfer of cash. The point being that part time employees and their dependents already get the same benefits.</p>
<p>I do indeed follow your logic and concerns about  Antenori- yet that still does not subtract from the merit of this bill that was 4o years in the waiting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JoeS</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=292#comment-1106</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JoeS]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 16:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=292#comment-1106</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good job Frank]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good job Frank</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jane</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=292#comment-1105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 14:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=292#comment-1105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don’t know Mr. Antenori personally but it seems the height of hypocrisy to pass a tuition waiver for the universities to fund in the same legislative cycle as passing a budget that cut hundreds of millions of dollars from those universities budgets.  As citizens, we owe a huge debt to our veterans and I would certainly be willing to pay increased taxes to create meaningful benefits for them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don’t know Mr. Antenori personally but it seems the height of hypocrisy to pass a tuition waiver for the universities to fund in the same legislative cycle as passing a budget that cut hundreds of millions of dollars from those universities budgets.  As citizens, we owe a huge debt to our veterans and I would certainly be willing to pay increased taxes to create meaningful benefits for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Parent X</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=292#comment-1104</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Parent X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jun 2010 11:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=292#comment-1104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll say it again - I support this bill but I think your enthusiasm for Sen. Antenori is misplaced.  This is yet another unfunded mandate that scores ideological points with people but didn&#039;t actually allocate money to pay for the veteran&#039;s tuition.  Part of being a responsible, fiscal conservative means that you balance your checkbook and look at the financial impact to ALL people (including the vast majority of vets attending AZ schools).
 
There is a lot of irony in the fact that &lt;strong&gt;Sen. Antenori voted  against university and K-12 funding 100% of the time in 2009&lt;/strong&gt;.  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.arizonaeducationnetwork.com/2010/03/2009-legislative-sessions-education-voting-record-by-legislator/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;100%.&lt;/a&gt; While he has been very good about defending  our US Constitutional arms rights, he has handily ignored our Arizona  Constitutional mandates to our public K-12 schools and universities.  As  a fiscal conservative, I question how he can be advocating for bills  that provide free tuition while undercutting hundreds of millions of  dollars away from our state universities.
 

 Glen Kerslake, President of the DM-50, Lawrence Portouw, President of  the Fort Huachuca 50 and Steve Yamas, Executive Director of Fighter  Country Partnership wrote a letter in May 2009 stating that they  “strongly encourage (the state government) to resist calls for further  cuts to education spending…”  They remarked that “Holding the line on  education spending is an investment in Arizona’s and America’s future”,  and pointed out that Arizona’s low per-capita education spending  statistics put our bases at risk for closure.
 

 Since that letter was written, Arizona’s legislature cut millions more  from our schools.  &lt;strong&gt;These cuts impact all of the families  currently serving on our Southern Arizona bases and to the soldiers  already attending our universities.&lt;/strong&gt; Ft. Huachuca also announced  that Jan that &lt;a href=&quot;http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_463093a0-9dbf-507d-90f4-43572626405b.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;488 jobs will be eliminated &lt;/a&gt;there in 2010.  Rumor  has it that BRAC is considering further reductions in Southern Arizona,  in part because of the difficulties they are having finding enough  skilled, educated employees and the hesitation military families are  showing due to the reputation of our schools and support for education.
 

 I was supportive of Senator Antenori during the last election, but his  words have not matched his actions when it comes to supporting the  economy of our area.  I can see where he is a great guy personally, but  that doesn’t always equate to making good choices for the future of our  state.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll say it again &#8211; I support this bill but I think your enthusiasm for Sen. Antenori is misplaced.  This is yet another unfunded mandate that scores ideological points with people but didn&#8217;t actually allocate money to pay for the veteran&#8217;s tuition.  Part of being a responsible, fiscal conservative means that you balance your checkbook and look at the financial impact to ALL people (including the vast majority of vets attending AZ schools).<br />
 <br />
There is a lot of irony in the fact that <strong>Sen. Antenori voted  against university and K-12 funding 100% of the time in 2009</strong>.  <a href="http://www.arizonaeducationnetwork.com/2010/03/2009-legislative-sessions-education-voting-record-by-legislator/" rel="nofollow">100%.</a> While he has been very good about defending  our US Constitutional arms rights, he has handily ignored our Arizona  Constitutional mandates to our public K-12 schools and universities.  As  a fiscal conservative, I question how he can be advocating for bills  that provide free tuition while undercutting hundreds of millions of  dollars away from our state universities.<br />
 </p>
<p> Glen Kerslake, President of the DM-50, Lawrence Portouw, President of  the Fort Huachuca 50 and Steve Yamas, Executive Director of Fighter  Country Partnership wrote a letter in May 2009 stating that they  “strongly encourage (the state government) to resist calls for further  cuts to education spending…”  They remarked that “Holding the line on  education spending is an investment in Arizona’s and America’s future”,  and pointed out that Arizona’s low per-capita education spending  statistics put our bases at risk for closure.<br />
 </p>
<p> Since that letter was written, Arizona’s legislature cut millions more  from our schools.  <strong>These cuts impact all of the families  currently serving on our Southern Arizona bases and to the soldiers  already attending our universities.</strong> Ft. Huachuca also announced  that Jan that <a href="http://azstarnet.com/news/local/govt-and-politics/article_463093a0-9dbf-507d-90f4-43572626405b.html" rel="nofollow">488 jobs will be eliminated </a>there in 2010.  Rumor  has it that BRAC is considering further reductions in Southern Arizona,  in part because of the difficulties they are having finding enough  skilled, educated employees and the hesitation military families are  showing due to the reputation of our schools and support for education.<br />
 </p>
<p> I was supportive of Senator Antenori during the last election, but his  words have not matched his actions when it comes to supporting the  economy of our area.  I can see where he is a great guy personally, but  that doesn’t always equate to making good choices for the future of our  state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
