<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Census Bureau Statistics For Veterans</title>
	<atom:link href="http://veteranveritas.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=356</link>
	<description>Hang out for combat veterans and families.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Dec 2013 18:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: fraser007</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=356#comment-1256</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fraser007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Sep 2010 00:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=356#comment-1256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike: Thanks for the response.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike: Thanks for the response.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Winneo</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=356#comment-1255</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Winneo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=356#comment-1255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Australia. Not only do the Aussies take great care of their vets, they also extend many more benefits and programs to vet families, particularly spouses.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Australia. Not only do the Aussies take great care of their vets, they also extend many more benefits and programs to vet families, particularly spouses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike_brewer</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=356#comment-1254</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike_brewer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:49:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=356#comment-1254</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for the compliment fraser.  Your narrative is quite good. Yes, indeed the notion of  deserters has been with us for years in conversations in coffee shops, taverns and Vet Centers.
While on patrol one day, I found a blue eyed blond haired soldier outside a village in Vietnam. Rigagmortus had set in, my first experience with that. I was told by  our Kit Carson Scout, ( a former NVA Regular),that he was a deserter and drug dealer. We were told to leave him. Odd eh? So was he listed MIA, since he was not ID-ed? Hard to say. Were there more like him, of course.
The other category that is left out are the expatriates that simply elected to stay in country. And their numbers are much higher than one would think.  And they are not kooks either. That saga is repeated in every war. I understand that thousands of men remained in Italy after WWll and the cocaine usage was extraordinary. I think that is mentioned in a book titled, &quot;The Dirty Little Secrets of WWll.&quot;
But the answer is yes from my perspective. Since Vietnam lingered with us for a decade and a half, many combat  weary soldiers who did not want to return to a nation that had no respect for them would just vanish on R&amp;R. I have believed for 40 years that there are a ton of Vietnam Vets, to this day, in Sydney, Australia and Bangkok, two very popular R&amp;R locations,  running coffee shops or using there military training to entrepreneurial ends. Are they listed as MIA? Again, hard to tell, as I am sure few use their birth names.
There is a fascinating book titled, &quot;Hard Men Humble: Vietnam Veterans Who Wouldn&#039;t Come Home.&quot; by Jonathan Stevensen.  Are they driven by survivor guilt or pure humanitarian motives to remain in the land of blood and guts and bond with both our allies and enemies? Kind of a queer brand of the &quot;Stockholm Effect.&quot;  Are they in the MIA ranks? Who knows?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the compliment fraser.  Your narrative is quite good. Yes, indeed the notion of  deserters has been with us for years in conversations in coffee shops, taverns and Vet Centers.<br />
While on patrol one day, I found a blue eyed blond haired soldier outside a village in Vietnam. Rigagmortus had set in, my first experience with that. I was told by  our Kit Carson Scout, ( a former NVA Regular),that he was a deserter and drug dealer. We were told to leave him. Odd eh? So was he listed MIA, since he was not ID-ed? Hard to say. Were there more like him, of course.<br />
The other category that is left out are the expatriates that simply elected to stay in country. And their numbers are much higher than one would think.  And they are not kooks either. That saga is repeated in every war. I understand that thousands of men remained in Italy after WWll and the cocaine usage was extraordinary. I think that is mentioned in a book titled, &#8220;The Dirty Little Secrets of WWll.&#8221;<br />
But the answer is yes from my perspective. Since Vietnam lingered with us for a decade and a half, many combat  weary soldiers who did not want to return to a nation that had no respect for them would just vanish on R&amp;R. I have believed for 40 years that there are a ton of Vietnam Vets, to this day, in Sydney, Australia and Bangkok, two very popular R&amp;R locations,  running coffee shops or using there military training to entrepreneurial ends. Are they listed as MIA? Again, hard to tell, as I am sure few use their birth names.<br />
There is a fascinating book titled, &#8220;Hard Men Humble: Vietnam Veterans Who Wouldn&#8217;t Come Home.&#8221; by Jonathan Stevensen.  Are they driven by survivor guilt or pure humanitarian motives to remain in the land of blood and guts and bond with both our allies and enemies? Kind of a queer brand of the &#8220;Stockholm Effect.&#8221;  Are they in the MIA ranks? Who knows?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fraser007</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=356#comment-1253</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fraser007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 07:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=356#comment-1253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didnt want to spoil Mike&#039;s article. He is a great man and does much good for our veterans. I just wanted to throw some reality to our military history.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didnt want to spoil Mike&#8217;s article. He is a great man and does much good for our veterans. I just wanted to throw some reality to our military history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: santacruzsam</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=356#comment-1252</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[santacruzsam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 05:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=356#comment-1252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good questions. Deserters were frequenly encountered in the jungle. Not sure if the D.O.D. counts them as MIA&#039;s or not. I am sure Mike will have an interesting take on this.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good questions. Deserters were frequenly encountered in the jungle. Not sure if the D.O.D. counts them as MIA&#8217;s or not. I am sure Mike will have an interesting take on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fraser007</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=356#comment-1251</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fraser007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 08:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=356#comment-1251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mike:
I am going to pose this question to you. Dont be offended. How many of our MIA were deserters? You put 550,000 troops in there-a % were draftees and how many went to the other side. Or were captured and turned once they were in there?
Our record in Korea was not great. You I am sure have read about that. I have talked to a source who figures 125 of our guys who stayed. At the fall of Saigon there had been deserters who didnt get the word to get out. The Joint Chief of Staff in an interview once said that thet were no &#039;Americans held against their will&quot;.

The VC and NVA had tens of thousands of their soldiers who came over to our side. Whats to say that 125 of our stayed. The VC had some French Communists who stayed over after the French Indo-China War. During the Second World War the Grmans had hundreds of thousands of Russians who fought on the Nazi side in combat units and police and support units.

In WWII there were about 50 British who fought on the German side. The Japanese had tens of thousands of British Commonwealth Indian troops who fought for a &quot;Free India&quot; on the Japanese side.
I believe that if they exist the US Government would just want to continue to pay the &quot;death benefits &quot; to the familes. As well they should. Hard to say what the North Vietnamese would have done with them??
I didnt want to bring this up on the day of MIA&#039;s but military history can be unforgiving.

]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike:<br />
I am going to pose this question to you. Dont be offended. How many of our MIA were deserters? You put 550,000 troops in there-a % were draftees and how many went to the other side. Or were captured and turned once they were in there?<br />
Our record in Korea was not great. You I am sure have read about that. I have talked to a source who figures 125 of our guys who stayed. At the fall of Saigon there had been deserters who didnt get the word to get out. The Joint Chief of Staff in an interview once said that thet were no &#8216;Americans held against their will&#8221;.</p>
<p>The VC and NVA had tens of thousands of their soldiers who came over to our side. Whats to say that 125 of our stayed. The VC had some French Communists who stayed over after the French Indo-China War. During the Second World War the Grmans had hundreds of thousands of Russians who fought on the Nazi side in combat units and police and support units.</p>
<p>In WWII there were about 50 British who fought on the German side. The Japanese had tens of thousands of British Commonwealth Indian troops who fought for a &#8220;Free India&#8221; on the Japanese side.<br />
I believe that if they exist the US Government would just want to continue to pay the &#8220;death benefits &#8221; to the familes. As well they should. Hard to say what the North Vietnamese would have done with them??<br />
I didnt want to bring this up on the day of MIA&#8217;s but military history can be unforgiving.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike_brewer</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=356#comment-1250</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mike_brewer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Sep 2010 06:33:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=356#comment-1250</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks. Was sort of wondering if anyone would pick up on the missing ones.  The real missing ones. The POW/ MIA&#039;s.  Might anyone know those numbers? Sort of a quiz.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks. Was sort of wondering if anyone would pick up on the missing ones.  The real missing ones. The POW/ MIA&#8217;s.  Might anyone know those numbers? Sort of a quiz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fraser007</title>
		<link>http://veteranveritas.com/?p=356#comment-1249</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fraser007]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 14:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tucsoncitizen.com/veteranveritas/?p=356#comment-1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[great article]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great article</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
