Comments on: One Veterans Take on Obama's Birth Certificate

By: marc

marc — Thu, 18 Mar 2010 01:48:40 +0000

Hello! Your post (One Veterans Take on Obama’s Birth Certificate – Veteran Veritas) does so well that I would like to translate it into French, publish on my french blog and link to you. You have something against it? Regards

By: Arizona Birth Records

Arizona Birth Records — Fri, 16 Oct 2009 08:23:31 +0000

It sounds interesting but I am not sure that I agree with you completely.

By: Birth Certificate Records

Birth Certificate Records — Thu, 08 Oct 2009 21:46:30 +0000

I was searching for Blogs about One Veterans Take on Obama’s Birth Certificate – Veteran Veritas and found this site. I am interested in your content and I appreciate sites like this.

By: ado1

ado1 — Thu, 23 Jul 2009 06:53:04 +0000

Posted on the campaign website is a "Certificate of Live Birth" which is not at all the same thing as a State of Hawaii Birth Certificate. A certificate of live birth is a document anyone from anywhere can obtain in Hawaii no matter where in Hawaii or any other state or nation the child was born. To state that Obama has provided a State of Hawaii Birth Certificate is a total lie and falsehood and meant only to mislead the ignorant even farther than the DNC has already mislead them.

By: twitter

twitter — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:53:34 +0000

Let me try one more time. Senators are vetted. There is no requirement as to where they are born only that they are citizens and you can be a citizen even if you were not born on American soil, consequently there is no requirement in the vetting process to establish without a doubt the place of birth. Whether you like it or not there is a requirement as it pertains to TPOTUS. Rather than pretending that the issue is sophomoric leave it alone. If the charge is bogus it will come to light. If it is true… we’ll see.

By: Mike Brewer

Mike Brewer — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 22:01:31 +0000

The vetting function those agencies perform far exceed birth place and citizenship which are seemingly intertwined. You declare, “there would be no need to vet a Senator….” This process is not in the realm of the common citizen or the need of the electorate. It is a fiduciary duty to perform such due diligence background checks on behalf of National Security. And that would not be considered specious, it would be called wise. Those agencies do not lack that wisdom.

By: twitter

twitter — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:07:45 +0000

There would be no need to vet a seator as to his place of birth, only that he is a citizen. you are making a specious argument.

By: ldonyo

ldonyo — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:26:16 +0000

He did provide it. Next question.

FYI, it is “Supreme Court” not “supream court”. I like “repubulian”, though.

By: leftfield

leftfield — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 13:22:00 +0000

It’s still an issue because a certain element of the right wing is prone to conspiracy theories. They need them to rationalize to themselves why the rest of the world cannot see what seems so plainly obvious to them. It is a method of avoiding cognitive dissonance; a very uncomfortable condition.

By: Carolyn Classen

Carolyn Classen — Wed, 22 Jul 2009 06:46:07 +0000

I’m not sure why this is still an issue. President Barack Obama was born in August 1961 in Honolulu. Hawaii became the 50th state in 1959 and all those born prior to that in the Trust Territory of Hawaii (including most of my large family most of whom are still living there) are U.S. Citizens.