Comments on: One Veterans View of Jon Justice or Whatever His Name Is

By: mike_brewer

mike_brewer — Thu, 20 Jan 2011 07:30:16 +0000

The mere fact that some cannot make the distinction between these two is as disconcerting as the speech itself. The absence of discernment skills is what makes for blind followers. The research that is conducted to capture and maintain listening audiences is sheared of intellectual content and fashioned for moo- cow like followers. The Glen Beck Show has a staff of Psychologists, that he pays handsomely, just to get you lathered up. It works, but only if you are not much of reader, and care little about accuracy and objectivity. See Forbes Magazine expose on Beck.

By: tiponeill

tiponeill — Tue, 18 Jan 2011 23:10:19 +0000

>I am certain that the salient difference between a fictitiously named Jon Justice and William Buckley would be their SAT scores
While that may be true, Buckley used his inherited wealth and education for purposes such as supporting segregation and nuking brown people.
Personally I prefer bigots with lower SATs who are less effective – like “Justice”.

By: The Lou Show

The Lou Show — Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:49:37 +0000

Rebel:
You are correct: Justice is NOT the only one to do harm. Add in: Hannity, O’Reilly, Savage, Coulter, Beck, Dobbs, and many more of their ilk.
Regarding the “Three Sonorans”: There is no equivalent. It’s a different mission, a different purpose. 3S has been defending against biased and unnecessary change at the state level. Justice is truly the dangerous one in reinforcing racism and hatred . . . very negative human attributes.
I applaud 3S in ALL of his successful missions.

By: TheRebel

TheRebel — Mon, 17 Jan 2011 04:26:17 +0000

What I would like to know is, why is it only Jon who does the harm? The 3's here is much more the inciter. Jon did the pinata video because Isabel paraded Joe Arpiro's head.

By: mike_brewer

mike_brewer — Mon, 17 Jan 2011 04:13:43 +0000

My reference to these gents is one of IQ, grasp of the dynamic antecedents of history, dialectic, rhetoric, syllogistic thinking and debate that has an end game beyond hearing the repetition of ones ideology like a drumbeat to a tribal people who have migrated.
Yes,Tip, I am aware of the infamous debate between Buckley and Gore Vidal, which was not an episode of Miss Manners. Nor, was there any absence of the now overused word, vitriol.
However, I am certain that the salient difference between a fictitiously named Jon Justice and William Buckley would be their SAT scores. If the latter had one.

By: mike_brewer

mike_brewer — Mon, 17 Jan 2011 02:07:22 +0000

And what adds to this soup, is the Cable News machine that is like a 21st Century Sanhedrin. God speed.

By: tiponeill

tiponeill — Sun, 16 Jan 2011 17:00:18 +0000

>Can you imagine this mans aberrations, laced with some obvious adolescent development issues of his own, being in the same room with Ronald Reagan, George Will, William Buckley,... Can we please stop the historical revisionism that pretends that characters like Buckley were any different from the Republican bigots of today ?

By: RH

RH — Sun, 16 Jan 2011 16:03:42 +0000

http://townhall.com/
Above is a site connected to Jon Justice/104.1 FM, one of Justice’s shills works there, she is headlined on his show weekly, note the fact he shills for this site and they for him, profits drive these folks, only way to fight hate radio, television is the way they did it during the 1960’s with the bus boycotts, right wingers love one thing above all else, money! Greed & avarice is their bible, motto, when they talk Christian family values, piety, compassion out one side of their “forked tongues”, remember they hate the poor, naked, hungry those sick and in prison as all deserving of their fates, now how contradictory is that, how false prophet is that? Jesus had a rich man come to him wishing to follow him, imagine today a rich person of any political leaning right, left or moderate makes no difference only differences is right wingers have no guilt for their wealth, prosperity, left wingers feel a bit of guilt, but both would do as the rich man did in Jesus’s time, go away sad, unable to do as he requested, give up their wealth to the poor, that was his requirement to follow him, now I know this is silly but lip service Christianity is not going to fool Jesus on judgment day, in fact one is either a atheist or a blind biblical goat for him to not know you! The most favorite of my bible passages is the saying for a “rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven is going to be as hard as a camel going trhough the eye of a needle”! The rich will have to dismount them camels and then walk taking either the narrow hard road or the wide easy one, but each leads to a different destination!
Reality is we need to choose our own paths, do we feed the poor or the rich hatemongers in our society? Do we follow Jesus or Satan? The bible clearly states we will know the false prophets by which proceeds from their very mouths, when did Jesus preach hate, greed was good?